The Life of an ECMC Complaint

Use the image slider to compare before vs after: An Erie resident filed a complaint with the ECMC about excessive weeds at KP Kauffman’s SRC Pratt #24-29D site just north of Vista Ridge on the Redtail Ranch Property on February 18th, 2026. By April 3rd, an ECMC inspector had verified that all the issues documented on a site visit on February 25th had been addressed.

Have you ever used the Colorado Energy & Carbon Management Commission’s Complaint tool? It’s the primary mechanism for impacted residents to raise concerns about oil & gas operations in Colorado, but it’s a bit of a black hole — you rarely know what happens to your complaint after you submit it.

We worked with our friends at EcoCarto to create a visual timeline that follows a real complaint made by an Erie resident — from initial submission to final resolution — regarding KP Kauffman’s SRC Pratt #24-29D site, and the sequence of inspections, reports, and corrective actions that followed.

Use the image slider to compare before vs after: The ECMC rules place a higher priority on fire mitigation around potential ignition sources, including enclosed combustion devices (ECDs), separators, wellheads, and production tanks. The operator was ordered to comply with Rule 610 by February 28, 2026.

Just as Crestone Peak Resources was required to shut down plugging operations near Aspen Ridge Preparatory Academy in Erie in 2017 after a nearby resident filed a complaint, community has a collective opportunity and responsibility to hold operators accountable.

This visualization is best viewed on desktop or laptop. Tablets and mobile phones are supported, though larger screens provide a better user experience.