Chair Robbins: This is the Energy and Carbon Management Commission. It is October 22nd, 2025. We are back in session. We’re going to take up docket 2301, an oil and gas development plan, the Washington OGDP. This one has an unusual procedural history. I think it was in September we heard the Washington OGDP and the commission voted at that time to stay further consideration of this matter. That was based upon the uncontroverted fact that there was a bald eagle nest within a distance that precluded the commission from being able to favorably vote on the OGDP.
Chair Robbins:Â My understanding from the record that I’ve read is that since that time and here in the recent weeks, the tree that contained the bald eagle nest lost not one, not two, but three limbs. And the third limb that was lost, it was blown down, contained the actual eagle’s nest. And my understanding is that if we were to speak with the CPW folks, they would confirm all of that and they would also confirm to us that there is no longer an objection from Colorado Parks and Wildlife relevant to the eagle’s nest and that it is no longer a factor for consideration by the commission in terms of looking at the OGDP in question. So the wildlife concern no longer exists. So with that I think the first order of action, and I’m looking to Attorney Boudreaux to maybe show up as well. Do I need to take any evidence on any of that or can that all just be sort of understood by commission as being true because then I’m going to take up the unopposed motion to vacate the stay.
Continue reading “Washington OGDP Docket 2301 Hearing Transcript (Bald Eagle Nest): October 22, 2025”


